25 Scenario-Based .NET SOLID Principles Interview Questions
When interviewing for a .NET developer position, one of the key areas you’re likely to encounter is object-oriented design, particularly the SOLID principles. SOLID is a set of five design principles that aim to make software designs more understandable, flexible, and maintainable. As these principles are foundational to writing clean, efficient code, knowing how to apply them in real-world scenarios is critical.
In this blog, we’ll dive into 25 scenario-based interview questions focused on .NET’s SOLID principles, helping you prepare for your next interview and sharpening your understanding of object-oriented design.
1. Single Responsibility Principle (SRP)
Question 1:
You’re working on an e-commerce application. You have a UserService
class that handles user registration, email sending, and payment processing. How would you refactor the class to adhere to SRP?
Answer:
The UserService
class has multiple responsibilities: user registration, email sending, and payment processing. To follow SRP, you should refactor it by creating separate classes such as UserRegistrationService
, EmailService
, and PaymentService
. Each class should focus on a single responsibility.
2. Open/Closed Principle (OCP)
Question 2:
You are working on a reporting feature in a .NET application. The current ReportGenerator
class generates various types of reports. How would you modify this class to comply with OCP?
Answer:
To follow OCP, you should make ReportGenerator
class open for extension but closed for modification. Instead of modifying the class every time a new report type is added, you can use inheritance or interfaces to extend the class. For example, create different classes for each report type that implement a common IReport
interface.
3. Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP)
Question 3:
You are designing an application where the Rectangle
class is subclassed into Square
. What potential issue could arise in violating Liskov Substitution Principle here, and how would you fix it?
Answer:
If Rectangle
has methods like SetHeight()
and SetWidth()
, and Square
overrides those methods, it could break the behavior expected from a Rectangle
. A square is a specific case of a rectangle, but the two classes should not share a parent-child relationship in this case. Instead, Shape
can be the common base class for both Rectangle
and Square
.
4. Interface Segregation Principle (ISP)
Question 4:
You have a class Printer
that implements both IPrint
and IFax
interfaces. The Printer
class is being used by several clients, but some clients only need printing functionality, and others only need faxing. How would you modify this setup to comply with ISP?
Answer:
You should break the IPrint
and IFax
interfaces into smaller, more specific interfaces, such as IPrintOnly
and IFaxOnly
. This way, classes only implement the interfaces they actually need, adhering to ISP.
5. Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP)
Question 5:
Your current class, OrderProcessor
, depends directly on the SqlDatabase
for saving order information. How can you refactor this code to adhere to DIP?
Answer:
To adhere to DIP, you should introduce an abstraction, such as an IDatabase
interface, and make OrderProcessor
depend on this interface instead of directly on the SqlDatabase
class. Then, the specific database implementation (SqlDatabase
) can be injected into OrderProcessor
via constructor injection, enabling flexibility in the underlying database used.
6. Single Responsibility Principle (SRP)
Question 6:
You have a StudentManager
class that handles student data processing, student reporting, and student database updates. How would you refactor this to follow SRP?
Answer:
To follow SRP, refactor the StudentManager
class by separating responsibilities into distinct classes, like StudentDataProcessor
, StudentReportGenerator
, and StudentDatabaseUpdater
. Each class should handle only one responsibility.
7. Open/Closed Principle (OCP)
Question 7:
You are building a payment system with different payment methods (Credit Card, PayPal, etc.). How can you modify the code to comply with OCP?
Answer:
You can implement an IPaymentMethod
interface with a ProcessPayment
method. Then, create separate classes for each payment method, like CreditCardPayment
, PaypalPayment
, etc. This way, you can add new payment methods without changing the existing codebase.
8. Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP)
Question 8:
You’re designing a system with a Bird
class and two subclasses: Duck
and Penguin
. The Fly()
method is defined in Bird
. Would it violate LSP, and how would you address this issue?
Answer:
Since penguins cannot fly, having a Fly()
method in the Bird
class would violate LSP. Instead, you could introduce an interface like IFlyable
and implement it in only those bird classes that can fly (e.g., Duck
).
9. Interface Segregation Principle (ISP)
Question 9:
You have an interface IEmployee
that includes methods for CalculateSalary
, SubmitLeave
, and ApproveLeave
. Some classes only need CalculateSalary
, while others only need SubmitLeave
. How would you refactor this to follow ISP?
Answer:
You can split the IEmployee
interface into smaller interfaces, such as ILeaveManagement
and IPayrollManagement
. This way, classes will only implement the methods they actually need.
10. Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP)
Question 10:
You have a ShoppingCart
class that directly instantiates the InventoryService
. How would you refactor this to follow DIP?
Answer:
You should introduce an IInventoryService
interface and inject it into the ShoppingCart
class via constructor injection. This way, ShoppingCart
depends on the abstraction, not the concrete InventoryService
class.
11. Single Responsibility Principle (SRP)
Question 11:
You are working on a large application where the FileHandler
class both reads files and logs actions to a database. How would you refactor this to follow SRP?
Answer:
To follow SRP, you should create separate classes like FileReader
for handling file operations and ActionLogger
for logging to the database. This way, each class handles only one responsibility.
12. Open/Closed Principle (OCP)
Question 12:
You are building a content management system with various content types (e.g., Articles, Blogs, News). How would you refactor the content management system to comply with OCP?
Answer:
You could define a base Content
class or an interface and then create subclasses like ArticleContent
, BlogContent
, and NewsContent
. This would allow you to add new content types without modifying the existing codebase.
13. Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP)
Question 13:
You have a class Employee
with methods like GetSalary()
and GetWorkHours()
. You subclass it to create a Manager
class, but managers don’t track work hours. How would you modify the design to adhere to LSP?
Answer:
To adhere to LSP, you can create a separate `WorkHoursTracker` class or interface, which can be implemented by employees who need to track hours. The `Manager` class would not need to track hours and could omit that feature.
14. Interface Segregation Principle (ISP)
Question 14:
You are building a notification system. There is a single interface INotification
that includes methods for sending email, SMS, and push notifications. How would you refactor this to comply with ISP?
Answer:
To follow ISP, you should break the INotification
interface into smaller, more specific interfaces like IEmailNotification
, ISmsNotification
, and IPushNotification
. This way, classes only implement the interfaces they actually need.
15. Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP)
Question 15:
You are designing an application where a `LoggingService` class is instantiated inside the `UserService` class. How would you refactor this to adhere to DIP?
Answer:
You should introduce an interface like ILogger
and inject the dependency via constructor injection. The UserService
class would then depend on the abstraction, not the concrete implementation of the LoggingService
.
16. Single Responsibility Principle (SRP)
Question 16:
You have a class OrderProcessor
that handles both order validation and payment processing. How would you refactor this to follow SRP?
Answer:
To follow SRP, you should split the responsibilities by creating separate classes like OrderValidator
and PaymentProcessor
. This way, each class focuses on only one responsibility.
17. Open/Closed Principle (OCP)
Question 17:
You are building a reporting system with different report formats (e.g., PDF, Excel). How can you modify the code to comply with OCP?
Answer:
Use an interface like IReport
with a method GenerateReport
. Implement this interface in separate classes for each format, such as PdfReport
and ExcelReport
. This allows you to add new formats without modifying the existing code.
18. Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP)
Question 18:
You are building a shipping system with a base class ShippingMethod
and subclasses StandardShipping
and ExpressShipping
. How can you ensure LSP compliance when adding new shipping methods?
Answer:
To comply with LSP, ensure that subclasses of ShippingMethod
adhere to the same behavior expectations. If a subclass overrides a method, ensure it maintains the original behavior so that clients of ShippingMethod
can use subclasses interchangeably without issues.
19. Interface Segregation Principle (ISP)
Question 19:
Your codebase includes an IMultiFunctionPrinter
interface that has methods for printing, scanning, and faxing. Some printers only support printing. How would you refactor this to follow ISP?
Answer:
Break IMultiFunctionPrinter
into smaller interfaces such as IPrinter
, IScanner
, and IFax
. This allows clients to implement only the functionality they need.
20. Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP)
Question 20:
Your code directly references the HttpClient
class for making API calls. How would you refactor this to follow DIP?
Answer:
Introduce an interface IHttpClient
and make the code depend on this abstraction. Then, use dependency injection to provide the concrete HttpClient
implementation. This improves testability and flexibility.
21. Single Responsibility Principle (SRP)
Question 21:
You have a class InvoiceGenerator
that handles invoice creation, tax calculation, and emailing the invoice to the customer. How would you refactor this to follow SRP?
Answer:
To follow SRP, you should split the responsibilities into separate classes: InvoiceCreator
for creating invoices, TaxCalculator
for calculating taxes, and EmailService
for emailing invoices. Each class should handle only one responsibility.
22. Open/Closed Principle (OCP)
Question 22:
You are working on a notification system that currently supports email notifications. You now need to add support for SMS notifications. How would you modify the system to comply with OCP?
Answer:
To comply with OCP, you should define an INotification
interface with a SendNotification
method. Then, implement separate classes for each notification type, such as EmailNotification
and SmsNotification
. You can easily add new types of notifications by extending the system without modifying the existing code.
23. Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP)
Question 23:
You have a base class Shape
with a method CalculateArea()
, and two subclasses: Rectangle
and Circle
. How would you ensure LSP compliance?
Answer:
Ensure that both subclasses override the CalculateArea()
method and return the expected results. The behavior of subclasses should match the base class expectations, so that you can substitute a Rectangle
or Circle
anywhere a Shape
is used, without breaking the system.
24. Interface Segregation Principle (ISP)
Question 24:
You are working with a system where the interface IVehicle
includes methods for Drive
, Fly
, and Swim
. You have a class Car
and a class Boat
. How would you refactor this system to follow ISP?
Answer:
To comply with ISP, split IVehicle
into multiple interfaces, such as IDriveable
, IFlyable
, and ISwimmable
. This way, Car
will implement only IDriveable
, while Boat
will implement ISwimmable
. This ensures that classes only implement the methods relevant to their functionality.
25. Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP)
Question 25:
You have a service OrderService
that directly instantiates a PaymentGateway
class. How would you refactor this to follow DIP?
Answer:
To follow DIP, introduce an interface like IPaymentGateway
and inject it into the OrderService
class via constructor injection. This allows OrderService
to depend on the abstraction rather than the concrete PaymentGateway
class. It also makes it easier to swap out different payment gateway implementations in the future.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
1. What are SOLID principles in .NET?
SOLID is an acronym for five design principles in object-oriented programming: Single Responsibility Principle, Open/Closed Principle, Liskov Substitution Principle, Interface Segregation Principle, and Dependency Inversion Principle. These principles help developers write more maintainable and flexible code.
2. Why is it important to follow SOLID principles?
By following SOLID principles, developers can produce code that is more modular, easy to test, and less prone to bugs. It also improves the maintainability and scalability of an application over time.
3. How do SOLID principles relate to .NET development?
.NET, as an object-oriented programming framework, supports the implementation of SOLID principles. By applying SOLID, .NET developers can design software that is easier to refactor, extend, and maintain.
4. How can I practice SOLID principles in real-life scenarios?
You can practice SOLID principles by refactoring existing codebases, building new applications, and taking part in coding challenges that encourage the use of clean architecture and design patterns.
5. What are some common pitfalls when applying SOLID principles?
A common pitfall is overcomplicating simple problems by over-engineering solutions to strictly follow SOLID principles. Always strike a balance between simplicity and design elegance.